5 posts
The OECD's Digital Education Outlook 2026 revealed an uncomfortable truth: students using AI produced better assignments, but scored up to 17% lower on follow-up tests without AI. When a tool does the thinking, real learning disappears.
READ MOREThe OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026 says generative AI can support learning β with conditions. Without proper pedagogical design, AI raises scores but steals real learning.
READ MOREResults from the AAC&U 2026 survey of 1,057 college faculty are alarming: 73% have personally dealt with AI-related academic integrity violations, and 78% say cheating has increased since generative AI arrived. The credibility of higher education is under strain.
READ MOREStudents using AI completed tasks 48% more successfully. Yet when AI was removed, their scores dropped 17%. The OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026 reveals the two faces of generative AI in education.
READ MOREA 2025 Harvard physics study found that AI tutors produce twice the learning outcomes in less time compared to traditional classroom instruction. Yet the OECD 2026 Digital Education Outlook warns that generative AI can both help and harm learning. What makes the difference?
READ MORE