16 posts
The OECD's Digital Education Outlook 2026 revealed an uncomfortable truth: students using AI produced better assignments, but scored up to 17% lower on follow-up tests without AI. When a tool does the thinking, real learning disappears.
READ MOREThe OECD's 2026 Digital Education Outlook found that generative AI raises task completion success rates by 48%, yet students who relied on AI scored 17% lower when tested without it. The separation of performance and learning is the central challenge facing education in the AI era.
READ MOREThe European Commission and OECD have joined forces to build an AI literacy framework for primary and secondary students. We explain its 4 domains, 22 competences, and what it means for education systems worldwide.
READ MOREThe OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026 reveals an uncomfortable truth: AI improves outputs but may not improve actual learning. Here is what the evidence says about when AI genuinely helps.
READ MOREThe OECD Digital Education Outlook 2026 says generative AI can support learning β with conditions. Without proper pedagogical design, AI raises scores but steals real learning.
READ MORE